[INFRA-170] Request for new repositories for PFI and MCS GUI Created: 09/Feb/18 Updated: 21/Feb/18 Resolved: 21/Feb/18 |
|
| Status: | Done |
| Project: | Software Development Infrastructure |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Normal |
| Reporter: | chihyi | Assignee: | shimono |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Reviewers: | chihyi |
| Description |
|
Name Description Function developed by IAA. |
| Comments |
| Comment by shimono [ 13/Feb/18 ] |
|
Added repos and PR. |
| Comment by shimono [ 14/Feb/18 ] |
|
chihyi could you also mark the github side? |
| Comment by rhl [ 14/Feb/18 ] |
|
I don't understand what shimono is asking for. The repos are created, so we can just close this ticket without review – if there's a problem we can open a new ticket. Let's try to lower the administrative burden on PFS as much as we can; we could consider moving things like requests for new repos from Jira to slack, but even if we don't do that, we can certainly relax rules on reviews when the reviews don't add any stability or quality to PFS. |
| Comment by shimono [ 15/Feb/18 ] |
|
PR is for public website at pfspipe. refer |
| Comment by rhl [ 15/Feb/18 ] |
|
I wondered what, "could you also mark the github side?" means. I propose that we simplify that way of working if possible. |
| Comment by shimono [ 15/Feb/18 ] |
|
https://github.com/Subaru-PFS/pfs_www_pipe/pull/29 |
| Comment by chihyi [ 21/Feb/18 ] |
|
Every thing looks good. Sorry I am slow, it's Chinese new year. |