I've checked doc/ics_doc/pfs_www_pipe repos, but there was no detailed list of slack channels. We can get a list of channels once someone logged in from browse channels, so there would be no need to have list-all-ish thing (we already have a list of commonly used one in pfspipe web page).

So, we can go ahead without changing anything in documentations.

Only PFI? ait_asiaa may be better to cover MCS? One potential downside might be the MCS hardware will be moved to Subaru pretty soon, but I don't think personally that this should be taken so seriously.

comments were posted about ait_asiaa, but also there were some comments against,

• from software point of view (as in PFS software slack), PFI part will not be limited to pfi+mcs, but strongly related to fiber assignment, image distortion, etc, and not kept only in ASIAA
• considering FPS as a sequencer, other components are sub-module called from it (of course, ETS is not directly called but on-exposure output is relatively similar)

Is this still valid yuki.moritani?

Well renaming has not been done yet, but looking the other channels, I'm not sure "ait-pfi" is proper name... if one channel is need analogous to SpS activity, it should be renamed to "ait-asiaa", I think.