[FIBERALLOC-30] Resolve issue of late finder chart images, i.e. where to retrieve ~ 2 Deg x 2 Deg images on the fly. Created: 10/Jul/20  Updated: 07/Mar/23

Status: Open
Project: Target to fiber allocation and configuration
Component/s: ets_shuffle
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Task Priority: Normal
Reporter: mxhf Assignee: Martin Reinecke
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Issue Links:
Blocks
blocks FIBERALLOC-26 Rewrite shuffle for PFS use case Open

 Description   

Max reported problems downloading sdss images larger than 1 Deg x 1 Deg.

 

This could be resolved either by downloading multiple subimages and "stitching" them together or by providing shuffle with an externally supplied image.



 Comments   
Comment by Martin Reinecke [ 14/Jul/20 ]

My experiments so far seem to indicate that I can retrieve images covering the whole PFS FOV with a single request. I'll continue monitoring this; if problems turn up in the future, breaking down the request into tiles of 1x1 degrees should not be too difficult.

Comment by Martin Reinecke [ 14/Jul/20 ]

> breaking down the request into tiles of 1x1 degrees should not be too difficult.

That statement may actually be too optimistic: since `retrieve_image` retrieves a region whose borders are not aligned with meridians (at least that's my impression, otherwise images near the poles would be quite distorted), there is no simple way to break down a large patch into smaller ones to be queried individually. So let's hope that SDSS will continue to deliver sufficiently large patches.

Comment by Martin Reinecke [ 15/Jul/20 ]

On branch "minimal_version" of https://github.com/Subaru-PFS/ets_fiberalloc I have put a very simple demo of the image retrieval in the file skyimage.py.

Retrieval from SDSS and DSS2 seems to work, but PANSTARRS and PS1 appear broken. If we need them as fallback I'll try to do further debugging and am grateful for any hints!

Comment by mxhf [ 16/Jul/20 ]

Hi Martin,
 
I would not worry about PANSTARRS too much right now. 
 
If there is also a way to externally supply an image via command line parameter, I would think this covers most usecases.
 
Max

Comment by Martin Reinecke [ 07/Mar/23 ]

Do we still expect to use this functionality, mxhf? Given how the expected functionality of shuffle in PFS has changed over the last years (it basically just selects suitable guide star candidates and does not re-point the tetescope on its own), we may not need it any more. It's not part of the software that's currently in use, in any case.

Generated at Sat Feb 10 16:53:07 JST 2024 using Jira 8.3.4#803005-sha1:1f96e09b3c60279a408a2ae47be3c745f571388b.