-
Type:
Task
-
Status: Open (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Normal
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Labels:None
Created on 2023-04-07 12:57:34 by Ali Allaoui. % Done: 0
Between stages there is implicitly a communication through COperatorResultStore (e.g. between redshift_solver and linemeas_solver, or between N redshift_solvers and classification_solver). This communication could be made explicitly in the API if there was an equivalence between COperatorResultStore and AbstractOutput, but there only exists a conversion from COperatorResultStore to AbstractOutput and not the opposite, which could be quite complicated to implement. It's a problem because we need this to consider the stages independently in order to have a real modular pipeline that could use existing outputs as input (as we do with linemeas, but not in a normalized way)