Uploaded image for project: 'DRP 2-D Pipeline'
  1. DRP 2-D Pipeline
  2. PIPE2D-271

Use visit/visit0 numbers instead of dates for all calibration and DRP products.

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Won't Fix (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Normal
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      We are currently inconsistently using visit numbers and dates to name and compare against calibration files. The rule should be to consistently use visit numbers. Specifically:

      BIAS/pfsBias-%(calibDate)s-0-%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits
DARK/pfsDark-%(calibDate)s-0-%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits 
FLAT/pfsFiberFlat-%(calibDate)s-0-%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits
FIBERTRACE/pfsFiberTrace-%(calibDate)s-0-%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits

      should be:

      BIAS/pfsBias-%(visit0}06d-%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits 
DARK/pfsDark-%(visit0}06d-%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits
FLAT/pfsFiberFlat-%(visit0}06d-%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits FIBERTRACE/pfsFiberTrace-%(visit0}06d-%(arm)s%(spectrograph)1d.fits

      datamodel is already correct, except for FIBERTRACE

       

      This will probably involve under-the-cover changes to registry/mapper parts.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              cloomis cloomis
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: